Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of accounting and finance in healthcare management; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

Meets Expectation

The presentation was highly effective and appropriately addressed the target audience.

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.

Limited Evidence

The presentation was totally ineffective and not targeted at the specified audience.

Meets Expectation

Cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

Approaches Expectation

Cite and report on most of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

Below Expectation

Cite and report on at least three of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

Limited Evidence

Does not cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper Advisory Board formatting including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper Advisory Board formatting. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper Advisory Board formatting. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper Advisory Board formatting. Does not conform to project requirements.

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.