HUM101 Portfolio project

Question Description

I had chose to do my Portfolio project on the high cost of education and attached my word document below. Please feel free to change any of the information and organize it as you see fit. I have already turned in the word document and received an 80%. Like I said this professor is pretty tough and grades really hard. Needs to be completed by 6th July / 7pm.

Options #1 and #2: Revised Topic and Outline

Overview
HUM 101 requires a Final PortfolioProject. This project will focus on an issue (social, professional, orpersonal) that you wish to investigate critically.

Please read the full Portfolio Project description and grading rubric, which you can access in Module 8.
This is the second milestone assignment that counts toward the completion of the Portfolio Project.

In this Portfolio Milestone, you will submit your revised topic and a first outline of your Final Portfolio.

Directions:

Submit a one-page academic outline with the following parts:
- a paragraph describing your revised topic selection and a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) statement to investigate critically
- An outline which includes:
  - main points
  - sub-points
  - engagement with the intellectual standards and elements of reasondemonstrating your strategy for critically investigating the topic. Youmay wish to refer to Chapter 5 of Paul and Elder (2012).
  - a reference section which includes three new scholarly references to support your introduction (Links to an external site.) and thesis (Links to an external site.) statement. Find peer-reviewed sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
Format your paper and references according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.), including a title and references page.
Review the grading rubric for this assignment below to understand the criteria for how your paper will be assessed.

assessed.

Rubric

HUM101 Mod 4 PM

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

5.0to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Projectis clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlinedin the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errorsin grammar and spelling.

4.0to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Projectis fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, asoutlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraphstructure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3.0to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Projectis poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistentto inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors ingrammar and spelling.

2.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Projectis not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format.Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5.0 pts

Total Points:25.0

The below is only for reference for the above assignment

Module 8

Option #1: Critical Thinking Paper on Issue or Problem

Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, write a paper that addresses the problem or issue via scholarly sources.
Your paper should include the following:

Title page: include your name, date, title of essay, and class
Introduction: provide a two-paragraph introduction (Links to an external site.) that frames the issue or problem carefully
Engagement with issue or problem using scholarly sources and the intellectual standards proposed by Paul and Elder (2012): Whatis the issue? Why is it significant? Why is this issue relevant to you(and/or your community)? What have you learned about the depth andbreadth of the issue or problem from scholarly sources? How do thescholarly sources aid you in fair-mindedness and logic?
Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflecton your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking.What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards andelements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creativesolutions? What critical questions remain?
References
Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains asection with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application ofthe module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers foreach module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your FinalPortfolio.

Details

Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it isacceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources tosupport your inferences.
Your paper should engage a minimum of six scholarly sources that are not required or recommended readings for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
Your paper should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font.

Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio

Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points)
Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)

Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Option #2: Annotated Bibliography

Select an issue or problem that you wish to investigate critically. Formulate a question or thesis (Links to an external site.) on the issue so that your research has a clear and cogent direction.

Use Paul and Elder’s (2012) intellectual standards to find a topic or problem that is clear, relevant, significant, and precise.

Now, construct an annotated bibliography (Links to an external site.) that addresses the problem or issue through scholarly sources. See this example (Links to an external site.) for a good overview of how an annotated bibliography should be
constructed.
Your annotated bibliography should include the following:

Title page: include your name, date, title of annotated bibliography, and class
Introduction (Links to an external site.): provide a two-paragraph introduction that frames the issue or problem carefully
Annotations (Links to an external site.):Summarize the main point or arguments of each scholarly source. Whatare the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? Whattopics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about,what would you say? After summarizing a source, it may be helpful toevaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with othersources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is thissource biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Eachannotation should be roughly one or two paragraphs in length.
Conclusion (Links to an external site.): Reflecton your issue or problem and how the sources informed your thinking.What have you learned? How can you apply the intellectual standards andelements of reason to this issue or problem to come to creativesolutions?
References
Journal Submission. Each module lecture contains asection with journal prompts that focus on reflection and application ofthe module content. Use the Journal Template to record your answers foreach module’s prompt(s). Include these entries at the end of your FinalPortfolio.

Details

Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it isacceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources tosupport your inferences.
Your annotated bibliography should include a minimum of 15 scholarlysources that are not required or recommended readings for this course.The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
Your paper annotated bibliography should be eight to ten pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font.
Refer to the Revision Checklist (Links to an external site.) for an overview of items to consider as you add final polish to your draft.

Keep in mind the following milestones throughout the course designed to assist you in crafting your Final Portfolio

Week 1: Submit Portfolio Topic (worth 25 points)
Week 4: Submit Revised Portfolio Topic and Preliminary Outline (worth 25 points)

Refer to the Portfolio Project rubric below to understand how your project will be graded.

Rubric

HUM101 Mod 8 PP

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40.0to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of critical thinking; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

32.0to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24.0to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

16.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

30.0to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

18.0to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

12.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

45.0to >36.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

36.0to >27.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

27.0to >18.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

18.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of thinking and reasoning.

45.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation

30.0to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Informationis from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation isrigorous, affording a comprehensive and coherent analysis or synthesis.

24.0to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Informationis from reliable source(s); interpretation and/or evaluation approachescourse expectations in developing a coherent analysis or synthesis.

18.0to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Reliabilityor relevance of sources or information is questionable. Someinterpretation and/or evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherentanalysis or synthesis.

12.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Reliability or relevance of sources or information is questionable. Little to no interpretation and/or evaluation.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

35.0to >28.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Providesstrong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts andapplications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

28.0to >21.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Somesignificant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, andanalysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinkingand reasoning.

21.0to >14.0 pts

Below Expectation

Majorerrors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis of concepts andapplications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

14.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications pertaining to critical thinking and reasoning.

35.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJournal Submissions

30.0to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Alljournal entries are completed. Each journal submission engages withassigned material. Each submission uses tools of the module to addressissues of critical reasoning.

24.0to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Atleast six journal entries are completed. At least six journalsubmissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the moduleto address issues of critical reasoning.

18.0to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

18to 13 Points: At least four journal entries are completed. At leastfour journal submissions engage with assigned materials and use tools ofthe module to address issues of critical reasoning.

12.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Atleast two journal entries are completed. At least two journalsubmissions engage with assigned materials and use tools of the moduleto address issues of critical reasoning.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

15.0to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least six to five credible sources.

12.0to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates four to three credible sources.

9.0to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

9 to 7 Points: Cites and integrates two to one credible sources.

6.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material

15.0to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sourceswell or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on theissue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

12.0to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

9.0to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

6.0to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

20.0to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Projectis clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay formatincluding an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to projectrequirements.

16.0



^{Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."}

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

How It Works

Step 1: Fill the Order Form
Complete the order form and upload all of your files, including any instructions, rubrics, or other materials provided by your instructor.